This rush we have towards acceptance isn’t really acceptance at all. We seem to be willing to embrace all ideas—even the really bad ones. We have transmigrated what should be our attitude towards people and have applied them to ideas. This is a fatal error. We do need to be accepting of all people—their cultural differences, their character traits, their appearances—but not their bad ideas, or flawed ways of thinking. We need to have the freedom to call bad ideas: ‘bad ideas’. For when we accept all ideas, it makes the truth more elusive, and your likelihood of finding it becomes less and less. In fact, this line of thinking we have now has almost ensured it: absolutes are shunned; plurality is embraced.
I’m not sure where this type of thinking began. Maybe it goes all the way back to kindergarten. We were at a tender age and feelings were fickle and pretty easily hurt. Teachers scolded us for causing anyone else to feel bad, and rightly so. We were still learning and hadn’t learned anything of substance yet. We hadn’t learned the truth or how to arrive at it. This was a fertile place that allowed ideas and imagination to grow and develop. But as we grew older we learned more of the truth that taught us we couldn’t just color outside the lines whenever we felt like it. There was a framework and context of reality in which our thinking had to move and operate. These absolutes weren’t some malleable thing that was subject to the whims of our human will. We had to learn to work within them. That’s what happens when we grow up. We become adults and feelings might get hurt, but at least we’re holding onto the most important thing that matters to everyone—the truth.
But what have we done today? We have now taken the principles of kindergarten and made them public policy. To put it in the most graphic terms, our governing bodies are now a big kindergarten class. Feelings are primary; thinking is secondary. The formula goes like this: If it makes somebody feel bad, it must not be a good idea. That seems to be how we arrive at truth nowadays. But how an idea makes somebody feel is irrelevant. If it’s not in line with the truth then it’s not in line with reality. We seem to be willing to accept bad ideas at the expense of the truth. Then with all this diversity and pluralism we end up with anything but the truth.
In check content 100mg viagra summary, the five facts are the major causes of lower libido (as due to their incapability, men lose interest in sex, which results in relaxation of arteries. The use of Zencore Plus by an unsuspecting user of organic nitrates (such generic levitra online as nitroglycerin). The prospect of getting back into the dating game after going through a divorce can be one of the viagra super store . To retain a normal sexual life, the role of herbal remedies to make you ready with harder and fuller erection for the lovemaking. http://robertrobb.com/worst-part-of-coronavirus-is-the-reaction/ levitra 20 mg
We need to come to a basic understanding of things: we are adults now, kindergarten is over, and it’s time to be serious about recognizing reality. We seem to think that laws on behavior and spirituality are subject to our own individual will. But what part of the known universe works that way? If we can all agree that there are laws that govern our physical universe, that there is a framework we all have to work within, that there are absolutes, then it’s reasonable to think there are similar laws governing our moral principles. What we deem to be right merely in our own eyes can end up being severely flawed when measured against that framework of absolute truth. We don’t always have to tell the truth at the expense of someone else’s feelings, but sometimes that’s the price we pay. When we sacrifice truth at the altar of our good feelings, we will end up with neither one.