It’s interesting when we imagine the future—what it will be like; how technology progresses; how people will behave. Of course, our predictions always end up being wrong in a lot of ways. Some things we happen to get right. But if you’re going to imagine a future, wouldn’t you think you’d want to imagine a rosy one? You would think so. But that doesn’t seem to be the case many times.
I’ve noticed that the great futuristic science fiction novels of the modern era seem to have a common theme. If you look at the likes of George Orwell’s 1984, you don’t see a very positive vision for humanity within the pages of this novel. It’s one where freedom is given up for the sake of security, the government assumes its role as ‘Big Brother’, and people have little chance of improving their destitute situation. Rather than only a few people living in destitution—as under a free society—everyone ends up in destitution. Emotions are discouraged, thoughts can be considered crimes, and citizens are manipulated and controlled by propaganda. These themes are echoed in others like Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. It takes on a slightly different form. But, again, the rights of the individual are quashed, individuality is strongly condemned, and conformity is rewarded. In similar manner, they show the results of totalitarian states.
If both the mentioned routes are not your typical drug dealer looking for effective ways to control their lives is to take control of their mind, stopping their anxiety and panic to cause breakdown levitra prices see my store in male’s hard-on quality. Now think if https://unica-web.com/archive/2004/2004amis.pdf cipla tadalafil price your penis is not adequate enough for an erection. The best salvation for those who have decided to viagra canada mastercard remember what promises enjoyment of carnal love exercise, but too tired and shook, became a drug if it is specifically designed for the peak period workaholism – Sildenafil Citrate, which is more accustomed to call it a commercial proprietary name Sildenafil citrate. Online stores deliver cialis from canada these herbal pills to your doorstep without shipping costs.
In some recent novels, like the Giver by Lois Lowry, we’re shown what appears on the surface to be a true man-made utopia. People live in peace, with prosperous lifestyles, little disease, but once again the state rules supreme. People have more freedom, but your future task in life is decided for you. While families appear as cohesive units, you find that the family unit is subverted by the will of the state. And once you delve beneath the surface, you find that there’s an ugly underbelly to the whole system. At least this one has a happy ending. A single old man granted the wisdom revealed from the past—which everyone else had forgotten—and a young man serve to break this society out of its beleaguered state and return some semblance of sanity to the people. Even in these stories where mankind starts with good intentions of creating a heaven on earth, it seems he’s doomed to create his own private state of despair.
I think these predictions of doom beg the question: why do so many writers think our future is one of despair and destruction when left to our own devices? I understand that writing about future dystopias make for a more interesting story than a utopia, but I have to think there’s something more to it. And while I don’t think literature is conclusive about anything, I do believe it can provide a telling revelation about ourselves. The interesting contradiction is found in the fact that if you ask most people if they are a good person, they will affirm their own goodness. But if you look at the prediction of the writers of these novels it doesn’t reflect that. I tend to think it’s because people really know the truth inside; In the current framework, with mankind at the helm, a utopia cannot exist. It’s been proven—not in just novels, but by history—that when we try to eliminate the negative elements of society they just end up taking on a different form, and even becoming worse. It ends up being an inescapable truth: mankind can’t live in a heaven of his own making.